Home
Members
History
Fred Fox '39
Henry Martin '48
Graduate School
Committee Chairs
Meetings
Current Projects
Princeton Traditions
How to Join
Related links

Princetoniana
C O M M I T T E E   H O M E   P A G E
 
  The     Nude   Olympics
 


 

A Possibly True and Highly Plausible History of the Princeton Nude Olympics

But Definitely Not an Explanation!!

born: Dec., 1970 ; died April 11, 1999

R.I.P.


  While many Princeton traditions have their origins in student activities from the 18th or 19th centuries of campus life, the Nude Olympics clearly came from a much more liberal period of societal history. It is virtually impossible to conceive of students from any previous eras participating in such wholesale lapses of decorum, and even if students were so inclined, few would have dared tempt the wrath of the less permissive deans. However, by 1970 many of the restrictive rules of campus life from prior eras, including mandatory chapel attendance and parietals, gave way to a more liberal set of behaviors.

 

  Princeton's Nude Olympics, an unofficial school tradition since 1970, begins annually at midnight of the first snowfall as hundreds of cheeky sophomores stampede through Holder Courtyard, which is lined with a thousand or so spectators. Mobilizing at a few hours' notice, students ready themselves by donning hiking boots and hats and applying some body paint.

  Excerpted from Sophomore(ic?) Snow Bunnies by Julie Rawe '97.

The Plausibly True Origins of the Nude Olympics

  The true origins of the Nude Olympics can be traced to the confluence of several inter-related events on campus beginning during the 1970-71 academic year. At approximately the same time, traditional public attitudes were facing real challenges, as Broadway theater included nudity in plays such as "Hair" and "Oh, Calcutta," and the first Woodstock Concert (1969) was often characterized as a Three Day Love-In of 500,000 young people.

  As the song said, clearly, "Something was in the air!"

  1969-1970 also happened to be the first year women were enrolled at Princeton. However, due to their limited numbers (128) and concerns by members of the administration about security and safety of their new charges, all the women that first year were housed in Pyne Hall, at the southern end of campus.

  Undergraduate women enrolled in the University as full-time students for the first time in the Fall of 1969 (excluding the handful of Critical Language women who were on campus in the later 60's studying various languages not offered at their alma mater). In the fall of 1970, during the second year women were on campus, a most peculiar tradition was born somewhat spontaneously that would evolve to take on almost mythic proportions in campus iconography, and even garnered a mention from the President of the United States when George Bush spoke at the dedication of Fisher-Bendheim Hall in 1991.

  Like many other campus traditions, the originators/instigators did not realize that their actions would ever be replicated, modified, and institutionalized by later generations. As a consequence, the origins of the Nude Olympics were wildly mis-reported by members of the Press, especially since the established University Public Relations officers were less than enthusiastic about the coverage this peculiar event or tradition received. In its final years, attempts were made to control media access to the event, even barring photographers and members of the Press from Holder Courtyard, where it was sequestered in vain attempt to calm it down.

  At that time (before the full implementation of the residential college system), the vast majority of freshmen and sophomores dined in five contiguous halls at the corner of University Place and Nassau Street (now part of Rockefeller and Mathey Colleges). This dining 'Commons' happened to be a long, uphill walk from many parts of the campus, and for years sophomores tried to select rooms in Holder, Campbell, Joline, and Blair Halls, all close to Commons (and far from Pyne Hall). To further exacerbate the situation, the architecture of Holder was fairly unique on campus, a complete quadrangle, with only four entrances making it an insular, enclosed area, often the site of misbehavior and mayhem.

Preconfigurations and Influences on the Development of the Nude Olympics

  During this same period, there were also several other incidents and characters that also deserve mention in any thorough history of the Nude Olympics. These include:

 

  • the Red Baron, a mysterious male student who appeared at several exams in the spring of that year, clad only in tennis shoes, a World War 1 fliers hat and goggles, much to delight of test-takers;
  • El Deuco Perverto, a mock heroic candidate for student government whose campaign celebrated the perversity of campus life and was known for campaigning door-to-door in the dormitories while wearing a trench coat and sunglasses, and occasionally "flashing" his constituents. One of the many highlights of his campaign was a parade across campus in a Cadillac convertible, led by his hand-picked security crew of scantily clad women, the Secret Cervix;
  • In addition, Streaking swept the American college campuses during the 1974-75 academic year, at Princeton and elsewhere;
  • Campus lore always mentioned a notorious but unconfirmed "nude volleyball game" that allegedly occurred sometime during the Sixties that was sometimes reported to have migrated from behind one of the clubs to the median strips of Route One;
  • On several occasions in 1969-70 (and perhaps earlier) members of the Rugby team had been known to return to their rooms with their clothes torn from their bodies and each year the team staged a nude run.

Arguably the First Nude Olympics, December, 1970

  According to well documented reports, one resident of the third entry of Holder from a group called the Bachelors Six was especially known for his antics, that sometimes included Reading Period tension reduction tactics with bottle rockets, unauthorized bonfires, and occasional sprints around the courtyard in the buff. Most times he soloed, but on rare occasion that year, he managed to coerce another to participate, jokingly dubbing the activity "Nude Relays."

  In December of 1970, their junior year, a surprise snowstorm settled across campus on a Thursday evening, only days before Holiday Recess was to commence. One of them, John Leidy '72, telephoned Public Safety to complain that several naked students were cavorting in Holder Courtyard. At the time of his call, nothing had in fact happened. Immediately thereafter, he also telephoned the offices of the Daily Princetonian with a similar report and asking if they would be covering the "Nude Olympics." When the Prince confessed ignorance of said event, Leidy then suggested they get verification by calling the Proctor's Office. When the inquiring Prince reporter phoned the Proctor's, his inquiry was met with the response, "We just received a call about that, and are sending an officer to look into it."

  Not long thereafter, a handful of individuals were indeed cavorting in the snowy courtyard in various states of undress, at times racing one another across the courtyard. Whenever a Proctor appeared on the scene, these "athletes" would disappear into one of Holder's many entryways, and then run through the underground corridors, to resurface on the other side of the courtyard, much to the delight of the growing crowd of onlookers who cheered their many escapes.

Whether or not there was full fledged nudity on this occasion is subject to some debate, but this event became known as the "snow riot" or "nude Olympics" and these antics were spoken of laughingly across campus by the following morning.

  One participant reported:

 

  I will take credit for being part of a standing midnight group that whipped Tom M. into a "frenzy" using the stimulant of choice in those days. That coupled with loud music and an unexpected snowfall caused Tom to open up the ground floor window and announce in his booming, melifluous voice, "IT'S SNOWING" (Tom always did have a keen sense of the obvious)...Lee K. was among the first to respond to Tom's riotous mating call and within minutes at least a dozen of us were swirling around in the snow in Holder courtyard. At this point people like S. and K. were certainly involved. By the time our numbers reached a hundred or so we decided to head to Witherspoon Hall, then Brown/Dod, then were headed for Palmer Square when the authorities intervened adn persuaded those of us leading this crowd (which had now grown to over 500) that it was probably best for everyone if we went to Dillon Gym instead, which we did and had hot chocolate, and then went back to our rooms peacefully.
  ..Weather like we are now experiencing always puts me in a mind of those days."

  And another participant said,

 

  My recollection was that there was a big parade in Holder on the first snowfall. However, I'm not sure how much clothing was worn because it was all-male in Holder at the time.
  I also recall that Santa Claus made an appearance!


The First Time is Easy, It's Harder to Establish a LastingTradition

  After that first nude snow frolic became legend, its story was passed to others on campus who were not there and it quickly began to take on mythic proportions. As long as the original perpetrators were on campus, it was not too difficult to convince at least some of them to repeat their performance the following year-- on the occasion of the first snowfall-- and a modest number of others brazenly declared that they too would run. With the graduation of that first group, the tradition might have died out completely, but instead, it slowly and inexorably gained momentum and even developing a set of "rules," especially when it became an established sophomore class tradition. Initially, this was simply a word-of-mouth preference, but before too long, it became a class expectation, anticipated and discussed throughout their first and second years.

  What began as a prank then grew to become jocular legend, and many contend that its growth and ritualization led to its ultimate undoing. In its earliest incarnations, the event was still something naughty, laughable, and ignored as much as possible by institutional authorities. But as it became more and more expected, by both the undergraduates, the town, and the media, it began to attract more attention than many were comfortable with. At the same time, the number of participants was increased as peer pressure, fortified by several hours of anticipatory alcohol consumption, fueled the derring-do of many sophomores whose uncertain attendance gave way to actual participation.

From Deviant Behavior to Mainstream Practice

  Several factors figured in the ultimate demise of the Nude Olympics:

 

  • While it was frowned upon by campus authorities, it was nonetheless condoned.
  • As they became an annual occurrence, the Orange Key Tour included their mention as part of the walking tour provided to prospective students and other campus visitors. Thus, what had previously been handed down from undergraduate to undergraduate as part of campus lore now became more established, occupying a place next to Woodrow Wilson, 1879, Continental Congress, Princeton Flag in Space, etc.
  • In an effort to tone it down and insure the safety of participants, the Dean's Office began to meet with representatives from the Sophomore Class to develop guidelines.
  • When the administration became involved, suddenly the Sophomore Class Officers had a purpose, and became the spokepeople for their class. They then felt it their responbility and obligation to perpetuate the practice, while also meeting with administrators.
  • Once those meetings began to take place, the Daily Princetonian publicized their progress-- or lack thereof-- making the plans subject of dining table discussion in all the residential colleges.
  • With the introduction of a campus-wide voice mail system, and the subsequent wide spread use of campus e-mail, an entire class could now receive information about the arrangements for the Nude Olympics.
      Prior to these two communications media, the event was transmitted via word-of-mouth, and since there was no fixed date for it occurrence, it was dependent upon adequate snowfall (e.g. "will we run if it only sleets?") and academic calendar (e.g. "If it snows during exam week, will we run?"). By centralizing communication of the event and it's "rules" in the hands of the Class Officers, what had been a somewhat spontaneous frolic took on a life of its own.
  • There were few, if any, real rules or a regularly contested, structured order of events. Rather, the Nude Olympics consisted primarly of hundreds of students shedding their clothes, some of them racing around, while others watched, to be followed by another action by another party, and so on.
  • About the only consistent "rules" were that
    1) the Nude Olympics would occur in conjunction with the first measurable snowfall of the academic year.
    2) the event would commence at midnight on the night in question, in Holder courtyard.
    3) Sophomores would run.

     

      As an exhibition game, what was once a fairly spontaneous free-for-all has become more controlled and less competitive. Twenty years ago, the Olympics included a 60-yard dash, a wheelbarrow race, and a three-legged relay. Nowadays, all that remains is a lap or two around the courtyard led by a freshman torchbearer-this year's bearer was mostly absent, since she slipped early on and doused the flame in a mud puddle-and "Olympics" seems a misnomer for a naked herd huddled in the middle of a courtyard, occasionally tossing a football.

          Taken from Julie Rawe '97's article.

     

  • As the event became an annual rite, more and more would be participants began fortifying themselves with alcohol on the night in question, and often by midnight, they were not particularly sober (or why else would they run around naked?).
  • Some mention must also be made of the role of the residential college system, which collected all freshmen and sophmores into five units, creating a smaller sense of community identity and at times generating an inter-college rivalry. If the Nude Olympics traditionally began with opening ceremonies in Holder courtyard (which was part of Rockefeller College), then representatives from the other four colleges felt they ought to participate as well!
  • Professor of English and feminist scholar Elaine Showalter also contends that Women's Liberation may also have been a factor in the demise of the Nude Olympics.

     

      In the late 1980s, the first and only woman undergraduate to participate in the Nude Olympics was the torchbearer. Then for some years, a few women runners darted furtively out together from a doorway, took a quick job and retreated...
      [By 1999] ...Feminism had obviously changed. If being part of Princeton meant taking off your clothes and running around in the snow, by God, women would do it, too. And they would do it proudly, as individuals, mingling with the crowd."


  • Finally, through its attempts to control, sanitize, insulate, and secure the event by enclosing it within the confines of Holder courtyard, the administration inadvertently created an environment that was now safe from the prying eyes of a larger public, thus making participants feel it was quasi-sanctioned.

     


 

The Decline and Fall of the Nude Olympics

 

  The publicity about the Nude Olympics was also a source of embarrassment, as its occurrence garnered unwanted attention in a wide variety of media outlets. Once it became well established, at first snowfall many local spectators would make way to campus, along with photographers and even television crews seeking to capture the event for wider distribution. One year, a grossly overweight fifty-year old local resident decided he would join in all the nudity, much to the dismay (and concern) of the student participants.

  By the 1990's it was clear that the Nude Olympics had evolved into a tradition that the administration found difficult to accept, not only because of its nature, but more importantly because of the inherent risk of serious incident in an increasingly litigious society. Each year, several participants had to be taken to McCosh Infirmary or the Princeton Medical Center in various states of inebriated unconsciousness, sporting injuries from slipping on the ice and falling. The crowd inside darkness of Holder courtyard was well in excess of 600, and there was real danger from having so many people in a confined space.

  In addition, some participants got carried away and made forays into the Borough, variously resulting in confrontations with police for such transgressions as shattering a stained glass window in Winberie's Restaurant (its replacement paid for out of the Sophomore Class Treasury!), arrests for disorderly conduct and lewdness, shoplifting while running naked through a convenience store, and damage to a chandelier in Forbes College.

  Sadly, the acts of a few led to the end of something quite laughable for many. Even those who never attended or participated in the Nude Olympics often got a chuckle from their existence. For instance, in January of 1999, near the end of a men's basketball game against Brown, a low chant could be heard coming from the student section. At first, only a few students picked up the cheer, but slowly-- as more realized what was being shouted-- their voices joined in a unison seldom heard from normally sedate student fans.
  "Let's get naked!" chanted the crowd.
  "Let's get naked!", followed by two claps, then three quick claps.
As the cheer soared, and could be heard by more and more clearly by those in attendance, suddenly it dawned on all those from the Princeton side--there was a heavy snowstorm outside, the first appreciable snow of the season. Tonight would indeed be the night of the Nude Olympics!
  This final rendition seemed more egregious than any of its predecessors, so finally members of the administration appealed to the Trustees for intervention. On April 11, 1999, the Board of Trustees voted to ban the annual tradition [Full Report]. The following August, prior to the beginning of the academic year, each undergraduate received a person letter calling his/her attention to this ban. In addition, their Parents and Guardians also received a similar letter, that included the sentence, "I want to encourage you to be sure that your student also is fully informed."

 



  © 2001 Princeton University. Created by Jan Kubik '70. 
Last update: 1-Dec, 01